A dentist's training is assessed on four criteria: a documented and dated path; time spent at the leading schools; continuity over the years; consistency between the courses attended and the clinical areas practiced. It matters most in implant, prosthetic and aesthetic treatments; for basic care it is not the first criterion.
Why continuing education is part of the choice
A dentist's training does not end with the degree: the professional literature frames continuing education as a structural principle of an entire clinical career, not as a formality (Brigden 2003). The four criteria that follow are elements the patient can verify on a public page, without asking the professional for guarantees.
A documented and dated path
The first criterion concerns form. A training path comes with names, dates, venues and mentors that can be looked up: degree, master's degrees, annual courses, symposia, with the organizing body and the year indicated. An encyclopedic list is not needed: it only has to be real, published and verifiable. The very fact that a training page is public and can be consulted is in itself a piece of information: it means the clinician accepts being read and compared. At Studio Buniato the training path of Dott. Gianluca Maria Buniato is published on a page dedicated to training, with the entries listed one by one: from the degree in Dentistry and Dental Prosthetics at the University of Turin to the time spent at international clinical schools. A curriculum without dates, without venues and without verifiable references offers less to go on and shifts onto the patient a verification effort that is not theirs to bear.
Training with the mentors of the leading schools
The second criterion concerns substance. A training path says a great deal if it includes time spent with the mentors of the respective clinical schools: in implant dentistry, in fixed prosthodontics, in reconstructive bone surgery, in operative microscopy, in dental aesthetics. It is not a matter of collecting well-known names, but of having learned the method at the source, directly from those who teach and publish in that discipline. On the practice's training page, for example, each entry lists the institution or mentor and the year: the annual course in fixed prosthodontics with Massironi, reconstructive bone surgery with De Stavola, the Implant Dentistry Program of the University of Zurich. It is up to the reader to verify that those names correspond to schools that teach and publish in that discipline.
Continuity over time
The third criterion concerns rhythm. Serious training continues over time: it is not a compact block in the years immediately after the degree, followed by silence. In a readable curriculum, courses can be seen spread across the years, with a progression that follows the evolution of the profession. The detail matters because techniques change: materials for bone regeneration, digital scanning systems, orthodontic aligners and implant protocols today are not those of a few years ago. A clinician who stopped at postgraduate training is not automatically less prepared, but the patient has no way of knowing whether the techniques with which they will be followed over time remain current. Documented continuity reduces this uncertainty, and it also applies to the maintenance phase: a treatment plan is followed for years, and the techniques used in check-ups must remain consistent with current clinical indications.
Consistency between training and clinical areas
The fourth criterion concerns consistency. A training path says something useful only if it covers the clinical areas in which the professional actually works. If a clinician proposes complex implant plans, it makes sense to find specific training in implant dentistry and reconstructive surgery in their curriculum; if they propose ceramic veneers, it makes sense to find training dedicated to dental aesthetics; if they work with a microscope, training in operative microscopy makes sense. An Australian consensus document published in 2010 in the Australian Dental Journal (Mattheos 2010) defines, for implant dentistry, what a student and a professional should have learned: it shows that recognized external standards exist against which a real path can be compared, instead of stopping at the individual clinician's statements alone. The link with the technology used in the practice also matters: an intraoral scanner such as the 3Shape TRIOS 6, a Planmeca VISO G3 CBCT or a Leica M525 operating microscope require dedicated training to be used well, not just the purchase of the instrument.
What is not a criterion
Some signals are not useful reading criteria. The mere number of courses listed does not say whether they were studied in depth or only passed through; the length of the curriculum does not equal its clinical relevance; attending a professional event does not equal having studied that discipline in depth. Academic titles, taken on their own, are not enough either: they say that a stage has been completed, not that the method learned is the one with which the patient will be followed. Neither the friendliness perceived in the first phone call nor the reputation reported by third parties is a criterion: both have a value, but they do not replace the documented path. The four criteria serve as a reading framework, not as a test to pass: training, read well, is one of the most verifiable pieces of a broader picture, which also includes the other elements that help distinguish a dentist: diagnostic transparency, dialogue, time devoted to the first visit, consistency between the clinical proposal and the evidence.
Frequently asked questions
If a dentist does not publish their training online, should I be concerned?
Not necessarily, but it is one piece of information fewer for those who are choosing. Asking at the first visit for a written curriculum with dates, venues and instructors is a legitimate and common request. If the professional shares it willingly and in detail, the reading remains possible even without a public page; if they do not provide verifiable references, the criterion of training transparency loses weight.
All the staff at the practice are very friendly, attentive and punctual, and flexible when necessary.
Show less
All the staff at the practice are very friendly, attentive and punctual, and flexible when necessary. I am very satisfied with all the work Dr Buniato has done for me, including resolving a difficult problem with a crown that had been going on for years, with attention to appearance as well as function. Even my daughters, who are in their twenties, are happy to go to the dentist.
Is a dentist with few courses but many years of clinical experience less reliable?
No, clinical experience counts. The point of reading continuing education is not to count its stages, but to understand whether the techniques used today have an up-to-date foundation. A professional with long experience and recent training in the areas in which they actually work offers both elements. The risk is not a short curriculum, but the absence of updates on techniques that have changed in recent years.
The whole team is warm, attentive and professional
Show less
I’m writing a little more than I usually would because I know how difficult it can be to find a dentist you genuinely feel comfortable with — especially when you are looking for treatment abroad. I came to Turin for dental treatment and honestly could not be happier that I found Dr. Buniato.
What impressed me from the beginning was how thorough and transparent everything was. He takes the time to do a proper assessment, with detailed images and analysis, and then explains clearly what is going on, what the different options are, which one he recommends and what each option would cost. You are never left in the dark or simply expected to trust that someone knows what is best for you. You understand what is being done, why it is being done and what to expect.
That same care continues throughout the treatment. He explains what he is doing and what you may feel before each step, so you are never caught by surprise. You can tell that he is incredibly precise and genuinely cares about getting every detail right.
And the result exceeded my expectations. I had virtually no pain afterwards, despite expecting quite the opposite. The work looks excellent, but even more importantly, it feels completely natural. After dental work, there is usually some adjustment period — you notice that something has changed, or your bite may feel different. With Dr. Buniato, I had none of that. Everything felt completely natural from the moment I left the chair.
I was also genuinely impressed by the technical standard of the practice. The equipment and technology are on a level I have rarely seen, and it is clear that they are used with real expertise rather than simply being there for show.
The whole team is warm, attentive and professional, and you get the feeling that they are willing to take the time needed to do things properly.
I would genuinely recommend Dr. Buniato to anyone looking for excellent dental care in Turin. I’m very happy I found him and will definitely be back for my future treatment.
How can I verify that a listed course was actually taken?
There is no need to go as far as the certificate. What makes a list readable is its precision: organizing body, venue, year. The organizing body and the instructors are generally identifiable online and allow a quick check. If a course is described generically, without references that allow even a partial verification, its informative value is low.
Dr Buniato and his team are professional, patient and empathetic, listening carefully and answering my questions.
Show less
The clinic’s appointment system is very convenient, and booking online is simple and quick. The treatment environment is clean, tidy and comfortable, with advanced facilities and a warm, relaxing waiting area that effectively eases the tension of visiting the dentist. Dr Buniato and his team are professional, patient and empathetic, listening carefully and answering my questions. Communication entirely in English was effortless. It was a wonderful dental experience, and I highly recommend it to friends and family!
For a single filling or a hygiene session, do I really need to look at advanced training?
No, the weight of advanced training concerns above all demanding choices: complex implant, prosthetic and aesthetic treatment paths. For basic care, the same diagnostic criteria applied to more complex cases remain useful, as does the consistency with which the same clinician follows the patient over time. Training, in that framework, is not the first evaluation criterion.
friendly and willing to listen
Show less
Clean and always tidy premises Excellent staff The doctor is always friendly and willing to listen and find solutions for every need The paediatric dentist is very pleasant and wonderful with children and teenagers The nurses complete the team with excellence and professionalism
For a personalized assessment of your case, Dott. Buniato is available for a specialist first visit with a complete diagnostic analysis. The practice is located at Corso Francia 30, Turin, with the Principi d'Acaja metro stop.
Sources
- Brigden DN, Grieveson B. Lifelong learning. Prim Dent Care. 2003. doi:10.1308/135576103322504094. PMID: 12621859.
- Mattheos N, Ivanovski S, Heitz-Mayfield L, et al. University teaching of implant dentistry: guidelines for education of dental undergraduate students and general dental practitioners. An Australian consensus document. Aust Dent J. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01245.x. PMID: 20887525.
